University Of Rochester MC
Rochester, NY
“The Niobe system has really changed the theory of movement in ablation, enabling me to reach places and make catheter movements I could not do before in a safe and stable manner,”
Desert Regional Mc
Palm Springs, CA
“Robotic is a much more stable procedure, which results in better lesion delivery and safety profile.”
Aria Health
Philadelphia, PA
“The technology allows me to get anywhere in the heart and has kept fluoroscopy time to under five minutes for almost every case.”
Advocate Health Care
Chicago, IL
“In regard to patient care and outcomes, there’s really no argument on whether catheter ablation with a Stereotaxis system is safer than a manual ablation…. We can get the equivalent and in some cases better results with robotic technology and it’s safer for patients.”
Bryan Health
Lincoln, NE
“I’ve always loved the idea of robotics, and Stereotaxis has provided me the ease of navigation in all aspects of the heart, which is impressive.”
NM Heart Institute
Albuquerque, NM
“So often after a Niobe procedure, I think to myself, ‘I never would have gotten that arrhythmia manually.’”
Mount Sinai St. Luke’s
New York, NY
“We’ve had countless procedures where Stereotaxis technology has been beneficial, allowing us to do things that are very difficult or impossible with a manual catheter.”
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, Netherlands
“Recent advances in technology…have been game changers.”
Zhejiang Hospital
Zhejiang Sheng, China
“I like the Niobe because it is safe, easy to control, has stable focal-contact and allows for less x-ray exposure.”
Intermountain Healthcare
Murray, UT
“I am a true believer in this technology for the range of ablation cases.”
